Are Social Networks Killing Blog Commenting?
| Posted by: Tali Shapiro |
When I surf the social media turf, I usually open a whole bunch of tabs, read the article, and comment on the social media site entry. That’s all fine and dandy with news sites, that give no option to comment, but what happens to blogs, in this process? The Blogger Vs. the Social Poster Vs. the Social Networking Sites
When a social poster decides to do the writer the honor and tell everybody he knows about his post, he is at the risk of taking the debate away from the writer and handing it over- on a silver platter- to the social network. Social networks, as you know, thrive on the content that it’s users create- free of charge. It took me a while to realize, that the comment I had just left on the social network, would enhance a debate in the blog itself. Why did I opt to comment on the social network and not on the blog?
1. This might be the first time I’ve ever visited that blog. So I’d rather answer my social buddy than answer a complete stranger.
2. There might already be a debate rolling, on the social network, that’s just not happening on the blog.
How Can the Blogger Solve this?
Well, this isn’t easy, but if you’re a dedicated blogger, you already know there are technical things you must do in order to retain and enhance a readership. Whether it’s coming up with interesting titles, writing about breaking news or simply not having grammatical mistakes. In order to improve response to your blog you could do 3 things:
1. Leave a question at the end of the post, luring the reader to make a response.
2. Write about a controversial topic, that’s sure to spark debate.
3. Be opinionated, because if you aren’t- people just won’t care, and if they don’t care they won’t be compelled to articulate their own opinion. Do you know of any other solutions for the writer? (see what I just did there?
)
How Can the Social Poster Solve this?
Social Posters are a very conscientious crowd. We all have an agenda. Whether we want our opinion heard, or we’re promoting a charity cause, or even a product- we all have an agenda. Because of this, I think it won’t be too naive of me to ask the Social posting crowd to think twice before they post a comment on the social posting site, instead of the blog.
Why Won’t the Social Networking Site Solve this?
Social networking sites are essentially built like forums. Forums are built in a way that makes conversation between people, thus, inevitably building communities around specific topics. Social networking sites have made it much broader: you can talk about anything you’re interested in.
Although the initial idea of sites such as Digg was to help you sort your news- a solution to search engines. You can rank the peace of news you found and you can comment on it. Problem is, as all sites, the idea is to make the site sticky. Social sites are a big business build of teams of people that actually enlist other people to create content for them. The lowly blogger is no match for this kind of power. In order for a blogger to be heard, today, they must participate in the social networks, thus fueling the network that may be killing him.
It’s true, social posting sites do give “the people” a voice and I do love’em, because they are, in fact, a vehicle to getting my voice out there. But then, so is the blog itself. And in the choice between the network and a hard-working individual, that posted content, moving enough to get me thinking- I vote for The Ramblings of Jon Doe, than the organized content-free-loading of Digg, Del.icio.us and the rest. Once again, power is centralized, seeing as there are always a few leading the many, I’m just asking whether social sites are another growing power to be worried about, too? And suggesting a few possibilities, how we can leave the power in the individual’s hands.
About the Author
Tali Shapiro is a freelance artist and writer, who learned the need for internet marketing, through a lot of bad personal experience. Now, after a few years of self-online-education and self-offline- discipline, she can pass on her wily experiences and worldly teachings through the wonderful medium of blog. Catch up with Tali’s marketing exploits on The Marketer Review.









February 26th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Do you want comments or clicks? If you want clicks (i.e., new readers), then be happy about the comments on Digg, Del.icio.us, bizSugar, etc. Those comments and votes make your story look popular which, in turn, makes people want to click on the link to see what all the fuss is about. If those new visitors become regular readers, then you’ll probably get comments of better quality than what are normally posted on social networks.
February 27th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
You make a good point, I mean I’d love to see comments written on my blog to discuss entries with people, but I also would like people to oh I don’t know, read it? If you don’t get people to read it, why would they comment on it?
March 1st, 2008 at 7:57 pm
While agree with the both of you, the social sites are definitely my main source of traffic, I think, we as blogging community should be aware of ALL implications. I raise these points. so we- as a community- could think up solutions. It’s pretty easy to see the social networks have the power, but us bloggers are individuals, our power is in our unity.
Further more, each community has a status quo of opinion, only individuals have the power to change the status quo, as the masses tend to follow.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:27 am
As a blogger, it doesn’t matter to me where people are commenting, as long as they’re commenting. I think bloggers can adapt by simply signing up for social networks and following the various conversations that erupt on the social networks. However, I think social networks should also be cognizant of this and allow visitors to the blog see the number of comments and votes a particular blog post is getting on social bookmarking sites. Digg does this already, but I hope Mixx follows suit.
March 4th, 2008 at 1:31 am
Clarification: I wasn’t entirely clear in the second part of that paragraph. What I meant is that, sometimes you can see how many comments a post has received on Digg when you are on a person’s blog (i.e. you will see something like “4 Diggs, 3 comments” in the bottom of a blog post, for example).
Anyway, I foresee an entrepreneur coming up with a social bookmarking site aggregator in the near future, whereby all comments and votes on a particular blog post made on different social bookmarking sites can be consolidated into one thread on one forum.
March 4th, 2008 at 3:35 am
The difference I see in the way I use social networking vs. commenting on blogs, is that when I comment on the social network, it’s mostly about the blog itself, what it’s about, whether I liked it or not, and found it useful. As for the blog itself, I will comment specifically to the author about the specific subject they are writing on, and the actual blog is where I will post my point of view, not on the social network.
I agree, that the social network should not be the place to hold debates, or express opinions that are aimed for the author of the blog. I don’t think the social media sites are going to kill blog commenting, I think they are a great way to see what topics people really want to read about, and are interested in, and it lets the community rate blogs and their relevance instead of Search Engine Algorithms.
March 4th, 2008 at 11:55 am
Grace! You’ve got a goldmine with that idea, find someone to develop it, quick!
March 11th, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Sounds like a good idea, but it may not work if your post hits the popular pages. Can you imagine putting together 400 incoherent comments on a page?
March 12th, 2008 at 11:08 am
The Jews have a saying, Nick: May those be your worries
March 21st, 2008 at 2:15 pm
When I find something really valuable I take the time to write a comment into the blog, otherwise I don’t even drop a line in the social network. I’m not sure if it’s a big issue to know where people comment… according to me, it’s all a question of quality vs quantity